September 16, 2026
I Once Commanded Which Side Men Stood On In My Presence But The Escalator Rules Confused Me Entirely

I Once Commanded Which Side Men Stood On In My Presence But The Escalator Rules Confused Me Entirely

Henry VIII learns the unwritten law of standing on the right and discovers London enforces it more strictly than any statute he ever passed

I once dictated exactly where every man in my presence was permitted to stand, down to the precise distance from the throne. I stood on the wrong side of an escalator at Bank station and was tutted at by four separate strangers within thirty seconds.

The Discovery

I had positioned myself on the left side of the escalator, believing this a neutral, unremarkable choice, and within moments felt a presence behind me, close, deliberate, radiating the exact silent disapproval I recall from bishops disappointed in my theology. I turned to find a man in a suit exhaling audibly, clearly unwilling to say anything directly but equally unwilling to let the moment pass unmarked.

The Rule

Dev later explained, with visible embarrassment at having to explain something so obvious, that the left side of any escalator in London is reserved for those wishing to walk, while the right side is for those content to stand, an unwritten rule enforced through pure collective judgement, with no signage, no official statute, and no appeal process whatsoever.

The Enforcement

I have since observed this rule enforced with a consistency I never once achieved for any actual law I personally passed, watching commuters shift wordlessly to the correct side without instruction, an obedience born entirely of social pressure rather than any threat of punishment, a form of governance I find, frankly, more effective than most of my own royal decrees.

The Violator

I witnessed, days later, a tourist standing on the left, phone raised, photographing the ceiling, entirely unaware of the six people queued behind him radiating a fury I recognised from my own court whenever a foreign ambassador overstayed his welcome. Nobody said a word to him either. They simply stood, and seethed, and let the silence do the work.

The Verdict

I have fully adopted the rule myself, standing dutifully on the right, walking briskly on the left when required, and I have concluded that London enforces almost nothing through actual law and nearly everything through a shared, wordless agreement that anyone who breaks it deserves to be silently despised by strangers for the following thirty seconds. I once needed an entire legal system to achieve a fraction of this compliance.

The Full Conversion

I have since caught myself correcting tourists on the correct side to stand, an instinct I did not expect to develop but which arrived fully formed within a fortnight, delivered in the same tone I once used to correct courtiers on proper form before an audience. I have become, entirely without meaning to, one of the silent enforcers I originally found so alarming.

Dev tells me this same silent rule holds, with only minor regional variation, on every escalator in every underground station in the city, an act of unspoken national coordination I find more impressive than most treaties I ever personally negotiated with considerably more paperwork involved. Further small humiliations of this exact kind are catalogued over in the chapters. Further reading on the wider chaos of modern Britain: Burnham’s transport fix arriving via the revolutionary technology of yellow paint, the proper London pub where history finally sat down for a pint, the full eyewitness account of how I came back in the first place.

Gertrud Schneider

Henry Is Back The novel sits squarely in the magical realist tradition: one impossible event — Henry VIII wakes on his own grave in 2026 — drops into a scrupulously realistic world, and the impossibility is never explained, resolved, or even investigated. Like García Márquez's ascending Remedios or Rushdie's telepathic children, the resurrection simply is, described as happening "by means unknown even to the omniscient." The book's innovation is where it relocates the marvel's consequences: not folk wonder, but bureaucracy. Britain absorbs a resurrected king the way it absorbs everything — with a form. His identity is rejected by a benefits algorithm, filed by a Church committee, roped off by the National Trust. Nobody disproves he's Henry VIII; nobody tries. The magic isn't denied, it's processed, which is the sharpest possible joke about a country that would ask God for two forms of ID. Stand-up comedy is the second engine: the one modern institution licensed to say true, insane things aloud, so total sincerity becomes legible only as "commitment to a bit." The flagstone (roped, then re-roped "out of respect") and the unexplained ELO song he keeps humming are the genre's classic leaks of the impossible — evidence that something happened, and Britain, true to form, simply finds it a chair.

View all posts by Gertrud Schneider →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *