September 26, 2026
Henry VIII Breaks With Rome

Henry VIII Breaks With Rome

Standup excerpt: “Henry VIII Breaks With Rome” (Modern Comedy Club Set)

Lights up. A guy in a Tudor outfit strides onstage like it’s a coronation. He grabs the mic with both hands like it’s a sacred object.

HENRY:

Good evening! Lovely to be here. Absolutely thrilled to be back in London—well, “London.” It’s smaller than I remember. And nobody bows anymore. Interesting choice. Bold.

Alright. So. I want to talk tonight about my most misunderstood life decision.

People are always like, “Henry, why did you break with Rome?”

And I’m like—first of all—can we not call it that? It sounds so dramatic.

I didn’t “break with Rome.”

Rome and I… we just wanted different things.

Rome wanted commitment.

I wanted options.

That’s not a schism, that’s a boundary.

Paces, warming up.

Everyone acts like I did it for power.

No. No, no, no. That’s insane.

I did it because I went to customer service—politely—ONE TIME—

and I said, “Hello, yes, I’d like an annulment.”

And the Pope was like, “We can’t do that.”

And I was like…

HENRY (calmly):

Okay.

Then I’ll speak to your manager.

And the Pope was like, “I am the manager.”

And I was like…

HENRY (beat):

Not anymore.

That’s not tyranny. That’s good leadership. That’s agility. That’s disruption.

That’s me looking at an outdated system and saying, “What if we pivot?”

So I pivoted. I founded a church.

You ever have a breakup so messy you start a podcast?

I started a religion.

And now historians are like, “It changed the entire spiritual identity of a nation.”

Okay—listen—if your ex makes you feel unheard, you do what you have to do.

Some people journal.

Some people text their friends.

I reorganized Western Christianity.

Leans in, confiding.

Also—people keep saying, “You dissolved the monasteries.”

Look. When you move out, you don’t take everything.

But you take what’s yours.

I’m not saying the monasteries were “yours,” Henry.

Okay but were they really using all that land?

Was anyone “living, laughing, loving” in there? No.

It was all—silence, chanting, and unlicensed beer.

And suddenly I’m the villain for doing inventory.

Beat. He reacts to the audience’s uneasy laughter.

Oh, I see what’s happening.

You’re doing that modern thing where you pretend you’re better than me.

That’s fine. That’s fine.

Let me bring it into 2026 terms.

Imagine you’re married. You’re unhappy. You go to the only institution allowed to approve a divorce.

And they say no.

So you don’t divorce.

You create an app.

You create “Annulr.”

And you’re like, “It’s not a divorce. It’s a reset. It’s a lifestyle separation.”

And suddenly everyone’s using Annulr. Your friends are like, “Oh my god, Annulr saved my marriage.”

Your enemies are like, “Annulr is destroying society.”

And the Pope is outside like, “Please stop downloading Annulr.”

And you’re like, “Sorry. It’s in the Terms and Conditions. I am now the head of customer service.”

That’s what I did.

He takes a sip of water like it’s sacramental wine.

Anyway. The weirdest part is people think I “refused to accept no from authority.”

That’s not true.

I accept “no” all the time.

From my wives, for example.

Immediate recoil, then he tries to rescue it.

No—no, not like—

Okay, that came out wrong.

What I mean is—

Look, I’m getting heckled by my own conscience now.

Which brings me to tonight’s main point:

In my day, when I didn’t like the rules, I rewrote them.

Now?

Now I try the same thing and I get stopped by the most powerful institution in the modern world:

A bored bouncer.

Because I walked in here and I said, “I’m Henry VIII.”

And the bouncer said, “ID.”

And I said, “I am the ID.”

And the bouncer said, “Sir, this is a comedy club.”

And I said, “I founded a church.”

And the bouncer said, “Cool. Two-drink minimum.”

Beat. He stares out, wounded.

Two-drink minimum.

That’s authority.

That’s the Reformation now.

Not doctrine. Not theology. Not sacred tradition.

Just some guy in a black t-shirt going:

“You can’t bring that in here.”

And the worst part?

He was right.

Pause. Then, with renewed confidence:

Alright—let’s do crowd work.

Who here has ever started an institution out of spite?

No?

Just me?

Okay—fine. We’ll talk about executions next.

Lights dim.

Gertrud Schneider

Henry Is Back The novel sits squarely in the magical realist tradition: one impossible event — Henry VIII wakes on his own grave in 2026 — drops into a scrupulously realistic world, and the impossibility is never explained, resolved, or even investigated. Like García Márquez's ascending Remedios or Rushdie's telepathic children, the resurrection simply is, described as happening "by means unknown even to the omniscient." The book's innovation is where it relocates the marvel's consequences: not folk wonder, but bureaucracy. Britain absorbs a resurrected king the way it absorbs everything — with a form. His identity is rejected by a benefits algorithm, filed by a Church committee, roped off by the National Trust. Nobody disproves he's Henry VIII; nobody tries. The magic isn't denied, it's processed, which is the sharpest possible joke about a country that would ask God for two forms of ID. Stand-up comedy is the second engine: the one modern institution licensed to say true, insane things aloud, so total sincerity becomes legible only as "commitment to a bit." The flagstone (roped, then re-roped "out of respect") and the unexplained ELO song he keeps humming are the genre's classic leaks of the impossible — evidence that something happened, and Britain, true to form, simply finds it a chair.

View all posts by Gertrud Schneider →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *